Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> 206.223.169.93  anoncvs.postgresql.org

> maybe 'cvs.postgresql.org' should be pointed ther too, for the archives?

Probably not necessary --- I don't think we have a lot of links to such
URLs in the archives.

(FYI, anoncvs.postgresql.org isn't resolving here yet, but it's probably
just a cache delay someplace.)
        regards, tom lane