Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Дата
Msg-id 14962.1247409296@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/7/12 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> If we're going to go for reentrancy
>> I think we should fix both components.

> when we don't use reentrant grammar, then we cannot use main sql parser in SQL?

It wouldn't be a problem for the immediate application I have in mind,
which is to re-use the core lexer in plpgsql.  But it does seem like
it might be a problem down the road as plpgsql gets smarter.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold