Re: pg_xlogdump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_xlogdump
Дата
Msg-id 14820.1361716471@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_xlogdump  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_xlogdump  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-02-23 14:54:51 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> I don't know if the Makefile needs to be taught not to delete it, or taught
>> how to recreate it once deleted.

> It shouldn't be deleted,

I came to the same conclusion and committed that a few minutes before
you posted.

> I independently wonder whether we should remove the PGXS stub from
> xlogdump, given it relies on a full sourcetree available?

I'd just as soon keep its Makefile looking like all the others.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)
Следующее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request