Re: pg_xlogdump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: pg_xlogdump
Дата
Msg-id 1361834056.819.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_xlogdump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_xlogdump  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 09:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I independently wonder whether we should remove the PGXS stub from
> > xlogdump, given it relies on a full sourcetree available?
> 
> I'd just as soon keep its Makefile looking like all the others.
> 
If the code doesn't actually work, it should be deleted.  There is no
value in keeping the Makefile looking like the others, because it
doesn't in fact look like the others.

I for one wonder why we even have PGXS support in contrib at all.  It's
not documented or tested anywhere, so it might as well not exist.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: json generation enhancements
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_xlogdump compiler warning