Re: pg_xlogdump
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_xlogdump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1361834056.819.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_xlogdump (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_xlogdump
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 09:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I independently wonder whether we should remove the PGXS stub from > > xlogdump, given it relies on a full sourcetree available? > > I'd just as soon keep its Makefile looking like all the others. > If the code doesn't actually work, it should be deleted. There is no value in keeping the Makefile looking like the others, because it doesn't in fact look like the others. I for one wonder why we even have PGXS support in contrib at all. It's not documented or tested anywhere, so it might as well not exist.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: