Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> On 03/18/2013 01:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On our 9.0.4[1] server my regexp_replace is a no-op, but on the 9.0.3[2]
>>> test machine and my 9.1.2[3] dev box all is fine
>> AFAICS from the commit logs, there were no changes affecting the regex
>> code between 9.0.3 and 9.0.4. I'm suspicious that your data is
>> different on the different servers.
> Good to hear, thought I might have glossed over the telling release note
> - my usual mo
Maybe we're barking up the wrong tree by suspecting the regex itself.
Perhaps the updates were suppressed by a trigger, or the transaction
rolled back instead of committing, or some such?
regards, tom lane