Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14475.1092673292@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Rather I would ask why we changed the
> description-loading routine in version 1.7 of initdb.c to use a copy
> from file instead of what happens everywhere else where initdb loads the
> file and feeds it to the postgres stdin?
That was to avoid a Windows-only newline problem. Don't complain too
hard.
You are in any case missing the point: -L is a useless switch and there
is no reason to make it easy to use. (I don't think I have ever once
had occasion to use it in all the years I've worked on Postgres, and I
have certainly run initdb in orders-of-magnitude more contexts than any
ordinary user would.) If I have to waste any more time on this
discussion, I will propose solving the problem by removing the switch
entirely.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: