Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Дата
Msg-id 142a230c-4fb5-317b-438a-ee5390873059@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/24/17 10:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Tom is correct here. They are not a net win for the average user. We
> tend to forget that although we collectively have a lot of enterprise
> installs where this does matter, we collectively do not equal near the
> level of average user installs.
>
> From an advocacy perspective, the average user install is the one that
> we tend most because that tending (in theory) will grow something that
> is more fruitful e.g; the enterprise install over time because we
> constantly and consistently provided a reasonable and expected
> experience to the average user.

I'm not completely grokking your second paragraph, but I would think 
that an average user would love got get a heads-up that their hardware 
is failing.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] patch: function xmltable
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.