Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1417.1573226360@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced
Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Hmm. Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation
> in a parenthical comment:
> This is particularly handy when restoring a
> <literal>pg_dump</literal> dump: the dump script should be restored in a
> pristine database (one where no user-defined objects exist and where
> system objects have not been altered), to ensure that one recreates
> the correct contents of the dumped database, without conflicting
> with objects that might have been added to
> <literal>template1</literal> later on.
So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical
definition for the first use? Works for me.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: