Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> This seems to make sense. Barring objection, I will commit this
> only in HEAD.
I'm inclined to think this is a slight improvement, just for the
sake of consistency with peer level information. You probably
already noticed, but the patch as submitted neglects to close the
prior sect2 block before opening the new one.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company