Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert
Дата
Msg-id 1366752869.62658.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 2013-04-22 18:35:04 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:

>>> I have observed that following sequence is causing server crash.
>>>
>>> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv AS
>>>   SELECT * FROM pg_class
>>>   WITH NO DATA;
>>>
>>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_refresh_mv()
>>> RETURNS int
>>> AS $$
>>> BEGIN
>>>  REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv;
>>>  return 1;
>>> END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>>>
>>> SELECT test_refresh_mv();
>>>
>>>
>>> I had a quick look over the crash and it is hitting following Assert in
>>> spi.c:
>>>
>>>                 else if (IsA(stmt, RefreshMatViewStmt))
>>>                 {
>>>                     Assert(strncmp(completionTag,
>>>                                    "REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ", 23) == 0);
>>>                     _SPI_current->processed = strtoul(completionTag + 23,
>>>                                                       NULL, 10);
>>>                 }
>>>
>>> It seems like we are missing expected value for completionTag in
>>> ExecRefreshMatView()

>> Possibly independent from this issue, but where did that 23 come from?

When the consensus developed to change the syntax from LOAD
MATERIALIZED VIEW I failed to noticed the length here when making
the changes for that.

> BTW, attached is the patch which works well for me, but need details review.

I suggest that we just rip out this section of code.  Trying to
provide a number here is probably all wrong, anyway.  As the
features evolve, there may not be a readily accessible rowcount for
this command in all cases.

Any objections to the attached to fix this issue?

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GSOC Student Project Idea
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report