Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert
| От | Kevin Grittner | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1366752869.62658.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 2013-04-22 18:35:04 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>>> I have observed that following sequence is causing server crash.
>>>
>>> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv AS
>>>   SELECT * FROM pg_class
>>>   WITH NO DATA;
>>>
>>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_refresh_mv()
>>> RETURNS int
>>> AS $$
>>> BEGIN
>>>  REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv;
>>>  return 1;
>>> END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>>>
>>> SELECT test_refresh_mv();
>>>
>>>
>>> I had a quick look over the crash and it is hitting following Assert in
>>> spi.c:
>>>
>>>                 else if (IsA(stmt, RefreshMatViewStmt))
>>>                 {
>>>                     Assert(strncmp(completionTag,
>>>                                    "REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ", 23) == 0);
>>>                     _SPI_current->processed = strtoul(completionTag + 23,
>>>                                                       NULL, 10);
>>>                 }
>>>
>>> It seems like we are missing expected value for completionTag in
>>> ExecRefreshMatView()
>> Possibly independent from this issue, but where did that 23 come from?
When the consensus developed to change the syntax from LOAD
MATERIALIZED VIEW I failed to noticed the length here when making
the changes for that.
> BTW, attached is the patch which works well for me, but need details review.
I suggest that we just rip out this section of code.  Trying to
provide a number here is probably all wrong, anyway.  As the
features evolve, there may not be a readily accessible rowcount for
this command in all cases.
Any objections to the attached to fix this issue?
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
		
	Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: