Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brett McCormick
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Дата
Msg-id 13655.6758.220979.189918@abraxas.scene.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]  ("Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
They do it by having all children perform a "listen" on the socket..
would the ipc stuff function as usual in this case?  I'm not clear on
how the ipc stuff works.

On Mon, 11 May 1998, at 17:18:38, Maurice Gittens wrote:

> Doesn't Apache do something similar? It should be easy enough to borrow
> their
> implementation.
>
> Regards,
>     Maurice.
>
>
>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brett McCormick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Следующее
От: AliE@atlas.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Is there any way to check the status of the Index table.