Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Maurice Gittens
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Дата
Msg-id 003e01bd7cf0$135b7cc0$fcf3b2c2@caleb..gits.nl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]  (Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers

>dg@illustra.com (David Gould) writes:
>> The idea that occurred to me is to have the postmaster
>> "pre-spawn" some servers in each (configurable) database. These would run
>> all the initialization and then just wait for a socket to be handed to
them.
>> The postmaster would during idle time replenish the pool of ready
servers.
>

Doesn't Apache do something similar? It should be easy enough to borrow
their
implementation.

Regards,
    Maurice.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jose' Soares Da Silva"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] money or dollar type
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]