Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
>> I failed to touch everything necessary to prevent MVs from
>> having OIDs. This patch fixes the reported problem, and doesn't
>> leave any gaps as far as I know; but I will do additional review
>> to try to catch any other omissions. I figured I should address
>> the reported problem now, though.
>
>> Will push later today if there are no objections.
>
> I object --- that's not a fix, that's a crude hack. It should
> not be necessary to introduce relkind tests there. Determination
> of whether OIDs exist in the target table should happen well
> upstream, ie in whatever is constructing the intoClause.
> Otherwise we'll be fixing code that examines the intoClause until
> doomsday.
OK. I started doing it that way, but saw how much more code was
changed than this way and gave in to an impulse to do a minimal
change. I really need to resist that impulse more....
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company