Re: Materialized views WIP patch
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1361456750.11476.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Materialized views WIP patch (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Materialized views WIP patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On 2/20/13 11:14 PM, Greg Stark wrote: >> That's not entirely true. From the database's point of view, >> TRUNCATE is in many ways actually DDL. > > Whether something is DDL or DML or a read operation (query) is > not an implementation detail, it's a user-exposed category. > Since TRUNCATE is logically equivalent to DELETE, it's a DML > operation, as far as the user is concerned. Not really. It doesn't follow the same MVCC behavior as DML. This is user-visible, documented behavior. -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: