On fre, 2011-08-12 at 20:09 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > On Aug 12, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> >> Anyway, the attached patch fixes it for me. That is when we don't have
> >> an array state, just return an empty array. (Also adds some
> >> additional comments)
> >
> > Fix confirmed, thank you!
> >
> > +1 to getting this committed before the next beta/RC.
>
> Policy question. If this problem hadn't been detected until after 9.1 was
> declared production, would it have been considered a bug to fix in 9.1.x or
> would it have been delayed to 9.2 since that fix might be considered an
> incompatibility?
Surely this would be a bug fix.