On ons, 2011-04-27 at 19:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It
> >> goes through a whole lot to figure out the timeline and then doesn't
> >> do anything with it.
> >
> > This hasn't been addressed yet. It doesn't manifest itself as an actual
> > problem, but it looks as though someone had intended something in that
> > code and the code doesn't do that.
>
> Do you have a ref to the actual problem? The subject change killed my
> threading, the email was trimmed to not include the actual problem,
> and it appears not to be listed on the open items list... ;)
In BaseBackup(), the variable timeline is assigned in a somewhat
elaborate fashion, but then the result is not used for anything.