Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1291747502.31995.5.camel@jd-desktop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? (Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 08:31 -0500, Vick Khera wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Command Prompt is currently considering writing a patch to provide > > synonyms to PostgreSQL. Is this something the community is interested > > in? Do we have use cases for it? MSSQL, DB2 and Oracle support them. > > > > I must be missing something, but really, what's the point of synonyms? > What's the real-world use case for them? For a PostgreSQL Person? I see no real benefit to be honest. For people coming from Oracle, DB2 or MSSQL? I see a real benefit in terms of ease of porting. I asked on the Oracle free list[1] and Synonyms are used and used a lot in Oracle. Anything we can do to help those folks run screaming from err.... port to PostgreSQL seems like a good idea. (Assuming we can do it reasonably) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake 1. http://www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Synonyms > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: