Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1291667462.20631.6640.camel@jd-desktop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 13:57 -0600, Andy Colson wrote: > >> I dont understand the need for it. Dont view's do the exact same thing > >> (plus even more)? What does a synonym offer that a view does not? > > > SYNONYMS work for things that aren't a table. > > The idea of synonyms for non-table things was pretty much rejected > already on the -hackers thread. Well I was referring to basically anything that is stored in pg_class (not operators or functions). Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: