Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6

Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane wrote:
>> To my mind, an option that's set to 1 is "enabled".  Should the second
>> para read "Do not disable ..."?  Or maybe we should reverse the sense
>> of the flag, so that the default state can be 0 == disabled?

> Well spotted, thanks. It should be "disable" instead.

> This is left from when the sense of the option _was_ the other way 
> around (it was called "real_realm" then). I reversed and renamed it 
> after Magnus reviewed the patch and was -- correctly -- opposed to the name.

Oh, OK, I don't wish to re-open the issue if it's already been thought
about.  Will just s/enable/disable/ instead.
        regards, tom lane