Re: git: uh-oh

On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:26 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mié ago 18 11:52:58 -0400 2010:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:33, Khee Chin <kheechin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I previously proposed off-list an alternate solution to generate the git
> > > repository which was turned down due to it not being able to handle
> > > incremental updates. However, since we are now looking at a one-time
> > > conversion, this method might come in handy.
> > 
> > cvs2git *is* the tool we've been using now that it's a one-off
> > conversion. It's the one that's causing the current problems.

We had a lot of luck with cvs to svn conversion in the past. And
supposedly the git-svn stuff is top notch. It may be worth a shot.

JD

> -- 
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>