Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1273155894.12659.455.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:09 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > It would be easier to implement a conflict resolution plugin that is > > called when a conflict occurs, allowing users to have a customisable > > mechanism. Again, I have no objection to that proposal. > > To implement, if you say so, no doubt. To use, that means you need to > install a contrib module after validation that the trade offs there are > the one you're interested into, or you have to code it yourself. In C. > > I don't see that as an improvement over what we have now. Our main > problem seems to be the documentation of the max_standby_delay, where we > give the impression it's doing things the code can not do. IIUC. I meant "easier to implement than what Florian suggested". The plugin would also allow you to have the pause/resume capability. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: