Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Дата
Msg-id 12535.1297644408@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Ответы Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> I sure would like it if the install script with no version in it corresponded to the latest version. Otherwise, one
mustrename the file every time one does a release. And as you're noting, you lose Git history that way.
 

(1) git does know it's a rename, it's just not default for git diff to
show it that way.

(2) I think that the normal use-case would not involve removing the old
file, so this is moot anyhow.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling