Re: VACUUMs and WAL
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VACUUMs and WAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1225196344.7694.2.camel@huvostro обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VACUUMs and WAL (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: VACUUMs and WAL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:10 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:45 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 08:49 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > Looking at a VACUUM's WAL records makes me think twice about the way we > > > issue a VACUUM. > > > > > > 1. First we scan the heap, issuing a HEAP2 clean record for every block > > > that needs cleaning. > > > > IIRC the first heap pass just collects info and does nothing else. > > Is this just an empty/do-nothing WAL record ? > > 8.3 changed that; it used to work that way. I guess I never looked at > the amount of WAL being generated. I can't see how it is safe to do anything more than just lookups on first pass. There will be dangling index pointers if the system crashes/is rebooted or the vacuum is just interrupted after cleaning some heap pages but before cleaning corresponding index pages. --------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: