On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 09:31 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:19 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > > I think you, as a Core member, should answer that question, not me.
> >
> > My core status isn't relevant, I think.
>
> I would agree, as I recall this isn't in Core's mission at all. The fact
> that you are also a major contributor is the status that matters here.
>
> > Oh, you got me. I am going back to hiding in my Death Star now. ;-)
> >
> > Seriously, I mean "we" as in "we (the community) require all
> > contributions to be anonymous", which is what you suggested. I did not
> > mean EnterpriseDB.
>
> Why in god's name would we require contributions to be anonymous? That
> is silly. However, I don't think we should attribute to companies in
> patches, we attribute to people.
...
I'm dropping off this thread now. My points have been made upthread.
Thanks for your time guys,
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support