On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:42 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> I think it would be more reasonable to look into what it would take to
> remove the (obvious) false positives and have the mirror script report
> new ones automatically during site build.
> Though I think what simon was actually refering to are urls pointing to
> external sites which we could maybe check on events/training whatever
> submission and refuse to accept them.
> The mirroring does not really care for external sites so we would only
> be able to spot mistakes that lead to urls that end up on wwwmaster
> (like it being interpreted as a relative link or such) not ones that are
> broken otherwise (domain misspelled, simply wrong,...).
Specifically, yes. But I am worried that we aren't monitoring such a
basic quality issue. There might be lots of URLs in the Wiki that go bad
over time and we want to check on this, don't we?
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support