Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Дата
Msg-id 12062.1556471641@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Not particularly on topic, but: including a patch version number in your
subject headings is pretty unfriendly IMO, because it breaks threading
for people whose MUAs do threading by matching up subject lines.

I don't actually see the point of the [PATCH] annotation at all, because
the thread is soon going to contain lots of messages with the same subject
line but no embedded patch.  Like this one.  So it's just noise with no
information content worth noticing.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck