AW: AW: Call for alpha testing: planner statistics revi sion s

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Тема AW: AW: Call for alpha testing: planner statistics revi sion s
Дата
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336832F@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
> > Because we do not want the dba to decide which statistics are optimal,
> > there should probably be an analyze helper application that is invoked
> > with "vacuum analyze database optimal" or some such, that also decides 
> > whether a table was sufficiently altered to justify new stats gathering
> > or vacuum.
> 
> And on what are you going to base "sufficiently altered"?

Probably current table size vs table size in statistics and maybe timestamp
when statistics were last updated. Good would also be the active row count, but 
we don't have cheap access to the current value.

The point is, that if the combined effort of all "hackers" (with the help of 
some large scale users) cannot come to a more or less generally adequate answer, 
the field dba most certainly won't eighter.

Andreas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Дата:
Сообщение: AW: AW: AW: Call for alpha testing: planner statistics revi sion s
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Doc translation