Re: Synchronized scans
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Synchronized scans |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1181323462.7660.183.camel@dogma.v10.wvs обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Synchronized scans (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Synchronized scans
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 11:05 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > BTW: Should we do the synchronization in the non-page-at-a-time mode? > It's not many lines of code to do so, but IIRC that codepath is only > used for catalog access. System tables really shouldn't grow that big, > and if they do we shouldn't be doing seq scans for them anyway. Does the > unstable ordering confuse any catalog accesses? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg01199.php There is a very minor assumption there that scans on pg_class will return in the same order. I'm not sure if that's even a problem. Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: