Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1175253689.4386.749.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update
Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:27 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote: > Is that always true? Could the backup not pick up a partially-written > page? Assuming it's being written to as the backup is in progress. (We > are talking about when disk blocks are smaller than PG blocks here, so > can't guarantee an atomic write for a PG block?) Any page written during a backup has a backup block that would not be removable by Koichi's tool, so yes, you'd still be safe. i.e. between pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup() we always use full page writes, even if you are running in full_page_writes=off mode. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: