Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1168225799.724.0.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS ("Adam Rich" <adam.r@sbcglobal.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 20:26 -0600, Adam Rich wrote:
> I'm using 8.2 and using order by & limit is still faster than MAX()
> even though MAX() now seems to rewrite to an almost identical plan
> internally.
Gonna need you to back that up :) Can we get an explain analyze?
> Count(*) still seems to use a full table scan rather than an index scan.
>
There is a TODO out there to help this. Don't know if it will get done.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: