Re: select for update

Craig James  writes:
> On 4/22/11 1:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Craig James  writes:
>>> select objectid from archive where db_id is null limit 1 for update

>> The interaction between LIMIT and FOR UPDATE changed in 9.0 ... what
>> PG version are you using?

> 8.4.4

Well, note what it says in the 8.4 SELECT reference page:

				Caution

	It is possible for a SELECT command using both LIMIT and FOR
	UPDATE/SHARE clauses to return fewer rows than specified by
	LIMIT. This is because LIMIT is applied first. The command
	selects the specified number of rows, but might then block
	trying to obtain a lock on one or more of them. Once the SELECT
	unblocks, the row might have been deleted or updated so that it
	does not meet the query WHERE condition anymore, in which case
	it will not be returned.

I think what's probably happening to you is you're getting a NULL not
because there isn't a matching row, but because somebody is updating the
first matching row underneath you and then the LIMIT prevents finding
any other matches.  However, that pseudo-code is too pseudo to tell
whether this theory is correct.

(9.0 handles these situations in a less unintuitive fashion, btw.)

			regards, tom lane