Re: Lock partitions
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lock partitions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1158050202.2692.444.camel@holly обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lock partitions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lock partitions
Re: Lock partitions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 11:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> It would be nice to see some results from the OSDL tests with, say, 4, > >> 8, and 16 lock partitions before we forget about the point though. > >> Anybody know whether OSDL is in a position to run tests for us? > > > Yeah, I can run some dbt2 tests in the lab. I'll get started on it. > > We're still a little bit away from getting the automated testing for > > PostgreSQL going again though. > > Great, thanks. The thing to twiddle is LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS in > src/include/storage/lwlock.h. You need a full backend recompile > after changing it, but you shouldn't need to initdb, if that helps. IIRC we did that already and the answer was 16... -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: