Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1153842028.2922.14.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2006-07-25 kell 11:26, kirjutas Tom Lane: > Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com> writes: > >> Strictly speaking, however, it would have to be NOLOCKLY in that case. :-) > > > In this case CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ... sounds better to me, although > > the whole feature sounds nice any way you will finally call it ;-) > > That reads well to me too. We'd need to check whether it can be parsed > without making CONCURRENTLY a fully-reserved word, but offhand I think > it would work because ON is already a fully-reserved word ... At some point we may add some other ops we start doing CONCURRENTLY, like perhaps CLUSTER CONCURRENTLY or even ALTER TABLE CONCURRENTLY ADD COLUMN x DEFAULT nextval('s'); and other table rewriting ops. -- ---------------- Hannu Krosing Database Architect Skype Technologies OÜ Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia Skype me: callto:hkrosing Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: