"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> To reiterate the basic point: The broken LSP breaks a fundamental
> promise in the sockets API that we absolutely require. The bug is
> completely within the LSP.
ISTM that maybe what we have here is a documentation shortcoming.
I'm thinking that our Windows FAQ ought to suggest troubleshooting
socket-related problems by removing LSPs one at a time.
regards, tom lane