Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:03 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.
>
> I meant to ask, why is this not the default or only behavior?

Historically, it didn't work that way, so I hadn't thought to change
that behaviour. We could I suppose... but I'm happy with just an option
to do --single-transaction.

> Your
> patch does not contain a documentation update, and so the user has no
> information about why to use this option or not.

I was waiting for tech approval of the patch before writing the docs. A
doc patch is enclosed.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs