Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1131396193.6884.108.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:03 +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > I agree with your points. One reservation I have is that people might > be more likely to run a beta in a production environment. Nowadays it > seems increasingly common for projects to release betas for > widespread circulation. I don't know if this is something that should > be encouraged for PostgreSQL. I'd hate to see people get a bad > impression of PostgreSQL because a beta screws up their data. IMHO it is fairly clearly a good thing to get more publicity for Postgres betas. That is the whole point of the beta program in the first place: I don't see that putting more beta information on the main website is fundamentally different from sending email announcing betas to -announce, for example. Provided that the caveats are clear, I think there's a lot to be gained by publicizing betas more effectively. -Neil
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: