On R, 2005-09-02 at 11:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > I wonder why we don't support more operators on Xid, so these things are
> > avoided? Right now we only have =, AFAIR.
>
> I once started to make a btree opclass for XID, and stopped when it
> occurred to me that XID comparison doesn't obey the transitive law.
> btree won't like that...
Does this mean that Slony's usage of btree index on XID gives
(occasionally) wrong results ?
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>