Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There's also the fact that it would probably end up parsing the data
>> twice. �Given xmloption, I'm inclined to think Tom has it right:
>> provided xml_is_well_formed() that follows xmloption, plus a specific
>> version for each of content and document.
> Another reasonable option here would be to forget about having
> xml_is_well_formed() per se and ONLY offer
> xml_is_well_formed_content() and xml_is_well_formed_document().
We already have xml_is_well_formed(); just dropping it doesn't seem like
a helpful choice.
> As a project management note, this CommitFest is over in 4 days, so
> unless we have a new version of this patch real soon now we need to
> defer it to the September 15th CommitFest
Yes. Mike, are you expecting to submit a new version before the end of
the week?
regards, tom lane