Re: Woops! New May quote/poll?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Woops! New May quote/poll? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1115306356.24440.54.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Woops! New May quote/poll? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Woops! New May quote/poll?
Re: Woops! New May quote/poll? |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:17, Josh Berkus wrote: > > I can't help but think that question is biased since it is pre-supposes > > that one should be against software patents. > > Hmmm ... your version is not terribly actionable though. Try: > > Should the PostgreSQL Community make a statement against software patents > on our web site? > > [] No, I favor software patents > [] No, we're not political > [] Yes, but low-key > [] Yes, as big as possible > Hmm... I tend to think my version is actually more actionable. Most of the reasons I hear that people are against software patents are related to how our patent system is run, not that people are against the idea of patents as a whole. The reason I think this distinction is important is because even if a lot of people say we should make a big statement against software patents, a lot of people would probably grumble about particulars of the wording. I think that with my wording, the focus is narrow enough that people could probably reach a consensus. I guess this assumes that people actually think about these types of issues and aren't just zealots, but perhaps I am misreading things. Let me know which way you want to go and I'll slap it up there. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: