Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )

"Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron@the-infinite.org> writes:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> Sounds like it's time to move to using 'arch':

> I see this going down the road of a religious debate, and to prove the
> point, I bring up BitKeeper:

Hmm.  I'd surely be the last to claim that CVS is the be-all and end-all
of software archiving systems.  But is BitKeeper, or arch, or anything
else enough better to justify the pain of switching?  This is intended
as an honest question, not flamebait --- I haven't looked closely at
the alternatives.
        regards, tom lane