Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )
| От | Alessio Bragadini |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c ) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1014891273.1649.351.camel@iris обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c ) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:44, Tom Lane wrote: > Hmm. I'd surely be the last to claim that CVS is the be-all and end-all > of software archiving systems. But is BitKeeper, or arch, or anything > else enough better to justify the pain of switching? This is intended > as an honest question, not flamebait --- I haven't looked closely at > the alternatives. There was a discussion on Slashdot a couple of weeks ago, with (as usual) some interesting comments out of the lot. It's at http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=27540&threshold=4&mode=flat including comments from Subversion's Karl Fogel. -- Alessio F. Bragadini alessio@albourne.com APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: