Re: ARC patent
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1106006195.14384.223.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ARC patent (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 10:15 +1100, Neil Conway wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 12:30 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > The biggest problem is going to be that if we release 8 with > > the patented stuff, then for a minimum of 3 years there will > > be liability for anyone running 8. > > > > We still have people running 7.1 and once you get something > > into production you typically don't just "change" it. > > Keep in mind that it would be conceivable to ship an 8.0.x release which > replaces ARC with another algorithm. That would be a somewhat > non-trivial change, but there's no reason we need to wait for a major > release (i.e. 8.1 or 8.2) to replace ARC. Agreed. > > Basically I think the fact that we are even considering leaving > > the knowingly infringing code in 8 is presenting a horrible > > face to the community. > > I agree with Tom -- this shouldn't be an impediment to releasing 8.0, > but it definitely warrants attention in the future. > Agreed. -- Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: