Re: ARC patent
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1106003704.22946.89.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ARC patent ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 12:30 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > The biggest problem is going to be that if we release 8 with > the patented stuff, then for a minimum of 3 years there will > be liability for anyone running 8. > > We still have people running 7.1 and once you get something > into production you typically don't just "change" it. Keep in mind that it would be conceivable to ship an 8.0.x release which replaces ARC with another algorithm. That would be a somewhat non-trivial change, but there's no reason we need to wait for a major release (i.e. 8.1 or 8.2) to replace ARC. > Basically I think the fact that we are even considering leaving > the knowingly infringing code in 8 is presenting a horrible > face to the community. I agree with Tom -- this shouldn't be an impediment to releasing 8.0, but it definitely warrants attention in the future. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: