Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Ah, I hadn't checked -- I was taking the function and struct names at
> face value, but it turns out that they're lies as well -- parse_real,
> relopt_real all parsing/storing doubles *is* confusing.
Yeah, that's certainly true. I wonder if we could rename them
without causing a lot of pain for extensions?
regards, tom lane