Re: additional GCC warnings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Neil Conway
Тема Re: additional GCC warnings
Дата
Msg-id 1098062556.22986.116.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: additional GCC warnings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: additional GCC warnings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> > -Wmissing-declarations ("Warn if a global function is defined without a 
> > previous declaration.")
> 
> Hm?  We have always used that one.

We've always used -Wmissing-prototypes. The documentation states that
-Wmissing-prototypes instructs GCC to:
       Warn if a global function is defined without a previous       prototype declaration. This warning is issued even
ifthe       definition itself provides a prototype. The aim is to detect       global functions that fail to be
declaredin header files.       
 
Whereas -Wmissing-declarations does:
       Warn if a global function is defined without a previous       declaration. Do so even if the definition itself
providesa       prototype. Use this option to detect global functions that are       not declared in header files.
 

Which doesn't make the difference in behavior between the two options
clear to me. Can anyone clarify this?

BTW, are these changes appropriate for 8.0?

-Neil




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test"
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test"