Re: additional GCC warnings
От
Neil Conway
Тема
Re: additional GCC warnings
Дата
Msg-id
1098062556.22986.116.camel@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: additional GCC warnings (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
additional GCC warnings Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: additional GCC warnings Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: additional GCC warnings Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: additional GCC warnings Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: additional GCC warnings Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: additional GCC warnings "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>
Re: additional GCC warnings Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> > -Wmissing-declarations ("Warn if a global function is defined without a
> > previous declaration.")
>
> Hm? We have always used that one.
We've always used -Wmissing-prototypes. The documentation states that
-Wmissing-prototypes instructs GCC to:
Warn if a global function is defined without a previous prototype declaration. This warning is issued even if the definition itself provides a prototype. The aim is to detect global functions that fail to be declared in header files.
Whereas -Wmissing-declarations does:
Warn if a global function is defined without a previous declaration. Do so even if the definition itself provides a prototype. Use this option to detect global functions that are not declared in header files.
Which doesn't make the difference in behavior between the two options
clear to me. Can anyone clarify this?
BTW, are these changes appropriate for 8.0?
-Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления