Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Дата
Msg-id 10964.1285108825@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, I can think of a fairly sizable reason not to remove it:
>> pg_dump issues "SET default_with_oids" commands in its scripts, and
>> has done for lo these many years.  So you'd be breaking backwards
>> compatibility with even-quite-recent dumps.

> Also, doesn't some SQL standard require oids, so we should have a way to
> enable them by default for all tables?

Seems highly unlikely.  If there is any requirement for unique row
identifiers in the spec, OIDs as currently implemented likely wouldn't
meet it anyway.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Get the offset of a tuple inside a table