Re: operator exclusion constraints

Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> For parity with unique constraints, I think that the message:
>> 
>> operator exclusion constraint violation detected: %s
>> 
>> should be changed to:
>> 
>> conflicting key value violates operator exclusion constraint "%s"

> Done, and updated tests.

I'm starting to go through this patch now.  I thought the consensus
was to refer to them as just "exclusion constraints"?  I'm not seeing
that the word "operator" really adds anything.
        regards, tom lane