Re: 4 Clause license?
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 4 Clause license? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1069337550.6596.51.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 4 Clause license? (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 08:34, Rod Taylor wrote: > > I think maybe the simplest thing is for me to prepare a patch that rips > > that code out and replaces it with a (slightly simpler - less umask > > hacking required, I think) piece of code that I will write. > > The FreeBSD folks sorted it out for us. > > Everyones names should be in the copyright for the file. The licence > portion should be the 3 clause version -- no advertising clause. > > I think borrowing should be encouraged, and now that we know what > license / copyright we need to carry over, this can be done without > worry. Ignore that.. I hadn't read Terry's statement yet -- it got snagged by the spam filter for some reason. Since we have other code which has the same issue, I think this needs to be solved. Can anyone show what Apple did? -- Rod Taylor <rbt [at] rbt [dot] ca> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: