Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1056405812.64205.19.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Perhaps the people on this list who are pushing 2PC could do the ground work? - 2PC is better than a standard transaction when dealing with multiple servers as it can recover in some circumstances (but not all). - 2PC (XA support as described by the X/Open group) is the only implementation of distributed transactions supported by many third party components -- that I'm aware of -- to the point where it is a part of the Java Spec on dealing with distributed transactions. - 2PC isn't very good in a number of circumstances, as such PostgreSQL should avoid its use when PostgreSQL has a choice in the matter -- like communication with other PostgreSQL servers. This is a case of learning to speak Japanese because all of the people you want to talk with only speak Japanese. It simply doesn't matter how good Esperanto is. -- Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: