Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1056122414.7070.2279.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 10:42, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 06:59, Justin Clift wrote: > >> The only thing that makes me wince is that we have a protocol change at > >> PostgreSQL 7.4 release instead of 8.0. > > > ...which is why I'd advocate making this release an 8.0 regardless of > > win32 or pitr. > > <shrug> ... The backend will still talk to old clients, and libpq will > still talk to old backends, so I don't think the protocol change is > really going to cause a flag day for anyone. On a technical level it's > probably not an adequate reason to call this release 8.0. > Can you give me an example of a technical change that would warrant a major version bump? > On the other hand, I dislike the notion that we would call a release 8.0 > simply because it now has a native Windows port. (And if there is a > short release cycle after this one, that might be about the only big new > thing there.) Considering that we aren't going to be recommending the > Windows port for production work, we should not let the release > numbering give the impression we think it's the greatest Postgres > feature ever to come down the pike. > yep. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: